

|
The
adoption of waste minimization by the research and educational community
carries with it a tremendous potential for designing pollution out of future
industrial processes right in the lab.
|
Reduction of pollutant emissions associated with research and educational activities is an important objective consistent with national environmental policy. Adoption of waste minimization carries with it a tremendous potential for designing pollution out of future industrial processes.
In 1989, U.S. EPA proposed a new pollution prevention policy making a commitment to shift its focus from controlling pollution after the fact to preventing it at the source. The Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 emphasizes this shift in the environmental policy.
Pollution Prevention in the Research and Educational Environment.
The adoption of waste minimization by the research and educational community carries with it a tremendous potential for designing pollution out of future industrial processes right in the lab. Good pollution prevention practice in the research and educational environment will develop an awareness of proper waste management and help raise a new generation of environmentally conscious scholars, engineers, and workers.
The chemical industry is discovering that their professional chemists are knowledgeable about pollution prevention concepts. They are able to identify, develop, and implement effective pollution prevention technologies. It is imperative that laboratory professionals from all disciplines be educated on pollution prevention concepts during their academic training in order for pollution prevention to become a standard in industry.
One factor that can greatly speed the incorporation of pollution prevention into industrial manufacturing processes is addressing pollution prevention issues in the classical chemistry curriculum. Research and educational institutions have unique waste management problems. Waste volume is not large compared to the typical industrial operation, but the diversity of wastes is considerable. Literally thousands of wastes are generated in laboratories as well as other operations such as arts, printing, photography, maintenance, and vocational programs. Decentralization in decision making is characteristic of the management structure of research and educational institutions. These facts mean that special considerations are needed when designing a pollution prevention program for a research and/or educational institution.
Laboratories have often turned to the use of lab-packs for the disposal of small quantities of hazardous waste. Lab-packs have provided a simple, short-term solution for the disposal of small quantities of chemicals. The increasing long-term costs and liability associated with the disposal of lab-packs makes them a less-than-desirable management option. Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) enacted by the U.S.EPA and amendments to the LDR by states may further limit this option.
Pollution prevention should be as much a part of doing business as worker safety and product quality are. Successful pollution prevention begins with a strong commitment to prevent generation of wastes. With pollution prevention policies in place, everyone in the lab should be involved.
Better operating practices are procedural or institutional policies
that result in a reduction of waste. Some examples are:
-
Waste stream segregation
-
Personnel practices:
-
Management initiatives
-
Training
-
Employee incentives
-
Procedural measures
- Documentation
- Material handling and storage
- Material tracking and inventory control
- Accounting practices
- Loss Prevention practices
- Spill prevention
- Preventive maintenance
- Emergency readiness
Discussed below are some specific ideas for improved management and laboratory
practices.
Management Practices
Some low-cost material management options that can be employed to reduce
chemical usage and disposal expenses are:
-
Centralize waste management and appoint a safety/ waste management
officer. This will facilitate a coordinated and efficient implementation
of regulations, institutional policies, and waste reduction goals. It also
provides an information clearinghouse for the staffs seeking advice. Because
of the semiautonomous climate in which most research is conducted, development
of an organizational mind-set is extremely important. Without this, further
efforts may have little or no effect. Establish annual goals for institution-wide
and departmental waste reduction. First determine past yearly totals of
waste generation, then assess economic and technical feasibility for establishing
and achieving specific reduction goals.
-
Establish an inventory control program to trace chemical usage from
cradle to grave. Perhaps most important, always be aware of the status
of hazardous waste. This task can be partially accomplished by setting
up a computer tracking and inventory system to track hazardous waste generation.
This will promote sharing of chemicals by common users, identify users
of extremely hazardous materials and high volume users, and delineate points
where waste reduction options are needed.
-
A Waste Exchange can be utilized when the material to be disposed
might be reused. In laboratory facilities, a waste exchange is generally
limited to unopened containers which have not been contaminated. A periodic
newsletter can be used to alert laboratory personnel to chemicals which
are available. If an on-site waste exchange is not a practical option,
there are several regional waste exchanges. Contact Ohio EPA Office of
Pollution Prevention for more information on waste exchanges in your area.
-
Conduct routine self-audits for all laboratories to minimize reagent
accumulation and maximize recycling and sharing of surplus materials.
Chemical Purchasing
Policies
-
Tighten puchasing controls. Institute procedures that are designed
to restrict hazardous chemical purchases to those needed for the current
instructional or research programs and in minimal amounts that reflect
short term use. Do not buy extra chemicals in bulk for supposed "savings".
A centralized purchasing program can monitor requests for chemicals, implement
policies such as staggered deliveries, sharing of chemicals among common
users, and plans for leftover chemicals.
-
Consider disposal cost at time of purchase. Many chemicals deteriorate
with time. When they must be removed, the disposal cost may be 20 to 50
times the original purchase price. The real cost of chemicals should be
regarded as the initial purchase price plus any ultimate disposal costs.
Disposal costs can often offset savings from buying in quantity.
-
Consider handling and disposal requirements. If the facility does
not have adequate storage and safety provisions for a chemical, its purchase
should be discouraged. Try to use nonhazardous chemicals or those that
are suitable for reuse.
-
Reduce expired stock. Negotiate expiration dates of chemicals with
suppliers based on their intended use. Order reagents in amounts needed
and stock smaller containers of chemicals. This helps prevent waste due
to surplus or shelf life expiration.
-
Use up old stock. Rotate chemical stocks to avoid expiration of
their shelf life. Note expiration dates. Use a "first in, first out" policy
to keep chemicals from becoming outdated. Avoid donations of chemicals.
Do not accept donated chemicals or "free samples" unless they meet a specific
need, as they can become a future waste problem.
Proper Training
-
Provide employee training. The major generating departments should
have a training program for all those who may generate or handle hazardous
materials. The training should include chemical hazards, spill prevention,
preventive maintenance and emergency preparedness and response. Soliciting
employee suggestions for waste reduction ideas promotes employee participation.
-
Educate all personnel who may generate or handle hazardous materials
on the benefits of waste minimization and specific techniques for reducing
waste generation. Communicate information through departmental meetings,
memos, seminars, presentations, and brochures. Provide special training
for procurement staff to raise awareness of the exit costs of unused chemicals.
Laboratory Practices
Practices that can reduce laboratory waste generation include:
-
Microscale experiments. These processes are specifically designed
to scale down the volumes of chemicals used in laboratory experiments and
generate less hazardous waste. The scale of starting material can be reduced
100-fold, leading to a parallel reduction in solvents required for these
experiments. Microscale practices decrease the hazard of fire and explosion,
and reduced exposure to harmful vapors. For more information please contact
the
National Microscale Chemistry Center
315 Turnpike St.
N. Andover, MA 01845
Phone: (508) 837-5137
-
Increase use of instrumentation and alternative teaching methods.
Modern instrumentation not only achieves more reliable results but also
reduces chemical usage. Alternative teaching methods such as interactive
video chemistry lab offer an alternative to the traditional "wet" chemistry
laboratory, reducing the use of chemicals and the potential hazards involved.
-
Substituting less toxic/ hazardous compounds, and/ or using an entirely
different experiment is often practical. For example, substitute sodium
hypochlorite for sodium dichromate; use alcohol for benzene; substitute
cyclohexane for carbon tetrachloride in the standard quantitative test
for halide ions; and replace acetamide with stearic acid in phase change
and freezing point depression experiments. In most cases, specialty detergents,
potassium hydroxide, or sonic baths can be used very effectively in place
of chromic acid solutions to clean glassware.
-
Laboratory experiments may be designed to eliminate waste. During
experiments include certain steps which will eliminate hazardous end products
by reusing the material for other reactions. This has the benefit of teaching
students to avoid generating hazardous wastes, and take responsibility
for their own wastes.
-
Pre-weigh chemicals for student usage in the teaching labs when
appropriate. This will reduce waste by spills and other mishandling. Students
can participate in pre-weighing and handling exercises.
-
Reuse or recycle spent solvent. When cleaning with solvent, reuse
the spent solvent for the initial cleaning and use the fresh solvent only
for the final rinsing.
- On-site distillation and reuse can be employed in some cases. Advantages
include the reduction of disposal costs and the reduction of purchases
of large quantities of new solvent. Distill and reuse solvent for classroom
experiments or as cleaning agent where ultra pure solvent is not required.
Small solvent distillers are available in a variety of sizes. Check with
fire and worker safety regulations regarding on-site solvent distillation
operation.
- Segregate waste streams. A properly labeled container for each waste
stream should be provided, thus providing for better waste management at
less cost. Do not mix hazardous waste with nonhazardous waste. Avoid dilution
of hazardous waste. Include waste segregation as part of the educational
process. Segregate recyclable wastes from nonrecyclable wastes. Segregate
solvent in a closed top drum and recycle. Segregate used oil from other
wastes.
- Segregate precious metal wastes such as those containing platinum, palladium,
and rhodium since they can be recovered using chemical procedures specific
to the particular metals. Silver containing solutions from photographic
and x-ray facilities can be sent to commercial firms that specialize in
recovering valuable silver. Many local photo shops will even take photo
waste free of charge.
-
Waste minimization technologies can be applied to the management
of metallic wastes and their solutions. Waste mercury can easily be recycled
depending on the type or degree of contamination. Contact Ohio EPA Office of
Pollution Prevention for more information about commercial mercury recyclers.
-
Provide a designated safe facility for waste storage, segregation and
treatment. This promotes proper management of hazardous waste and aid
in waste reduction.
-
Label incoming chemicals. When stocking new chemicals, label with
purchasing date, and add storage code and safety precautions. Include information
required by workers right-to-know regulations.
-
Maintain labels. Routinely inspect and clean old containers, tighten
lids, and maintain legible labels. Re-label as necessary. Unidentified
reagents and wastes cannot be legally shipped for disposal and present
a particularly troublesome waste management problem.
-
Develop an "orphan chemical exchange" program by running inventory
of unused reagent chemicals for use by other laboratories. This keeps surplus
materials from being unnecessarily discarded. This can be set up as a special
stockroom where unused reagents can be returned and offered to others.
Alternatively, a material exchange sheet containing "available" and "wanted"
listings can be created as part of an inventory control system.
Ohio EPA Office of Pollution Prevention
offers case studies on orphan chemical exhange programs in Ohio. In some
cases, it may be possible and profitable to coordinate with different laboratories
to have instruction done at one centralized location. This would allow
consolidation of laboratory waste generation and its management.
Conclusion
Under current regulations, all generators are responsible for the safe
cradle-to-grave management of any hazardous waste that they generate. Laboratories
are recognizing that they need to reassess existing chemical waste management
to alleviate the pressure of skyrocketing disposal costs, aggressive enforcement
and future liability.
The best way to manage the waste problem is to prevent waste wherever
possible.
Sources
American Chemical Society. 1985. Less Is Better. Washington, DC.
California Department of Health Services. 1988. Waste Audit Study: Research and Instructional Institutions. Sacramento, CA.
Michigan State Board of Education. 1992. Pollution Prevention in Schools. Lansing, MI.
National Research Council. 1983. Prudent Practices for Disposal of Chemicals from Laboratories. National Academy Press.
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. 1986. Management Strategies and Technologies for the Minimization of Chemical Wastes from Laboratories. Raleigh, NC.
Rice, S.C. October 24, 1988. Minimizing Wastes from R&D Activities. Chemical Engineering. Pg 85-88.
Sanders, H.J. 1986. Hazardous Waste in Academic Labs. Chemical and Engineering News. 64:21-31.
USEPA. 1990. Guides to Pollution Prevention: Research and Educational Institutions. EPA/625/7-90/010.
USEPA. 1990. Guides to Pollution Prevention: Selected Hospital Waste Streams. EPA/625/7-90/009.
USEPA. 1996. Partners for the Environment - Green Chemistry Challenge. http://es.epa.gov/partners/chemstry/chemstry.html.
This is the 16th in a series of fact sheets Ohio EPA has prepared on
pollution prevention. For more information call the Office of Pollution
Prevention at (614) 644-3469. |