State Agencies | Online Services
We are actively working on solutions that work for Ohio. While efforts to control nutrient enrichment over the past 30 years have yielded some positive results, current evidence shows the need to develop newer solutions and improve the effectiveness and efficiency of existing strategies to reduce nutrients in our waterways.
It is caused by too much nitrogen and phosphorus in water. Nutrients are chemical elements that all living organisms—plants and animals—need to grow.
When too much nitrogen and phosphorus enter the environment—usually from a wide range of human activities—the water can become polluted. The primary sources of nutrient pollution are runoff of fertilizers, animal manure, sewage treatment plant discharges, stormwater runoff, car and power plant emissions, and failing septic tanks.
Water pollution caused by excessive amounts of nutrients is quite evident in Ohio's many lakes, rivers, and streams. Approximately 48% of Ohio's watersheds are degraded by nutrient loading from phosphorus and nitrogen. Conditions in Ohio's surface waters have reached a critical situation.
In Ohio, nutrient pollution causes many problems such as:
To address these problems, Ohio citizens will need to make significant changes regarding the management of agricultural and urban landscapes to minimize the influx of nutrients to our waterways.
Further consideration must be given to the design, construction, and operation of nutrient removal technologies at wastewater treatment facilities.
The nature of these changes and the approaches taken by governmental agencies, agri-businesses, farmers, landowners, wastewater treatment service providers and researchers must be constructively debated and quickly implemented if further damage to the environment is to be avoided.
U.S. EPA has asked states to develop statewide nutrient reduction plans. Ohio's EPA, Department of Agriculture and Department of Natural Resources have developed a statewide Nutrient Reduction Strategy. The initial framework was submitted to U.S. EPA on November 15, 2011. The final strategy was submitted to U.S. EPA on June 28, 2013.
During this workshop, water quality experts provided valuable information regarding Ohio's efforts to reduce nutrients reaching the state's waterways. Stakeholders from all sectors and regions were encouraged to attend this initial Visioning Workshop, and discussion helped set the stage for future Ohio Nutrient Forums.
Ongoing State initiatives that were discussed included the Lake Erie Phosphorus Task Force, the Directors' Agricultural Nutrients and Water Quality Working Group, and the Directors' Point Source/Urban Work Group.
Ohio EPA's current approach to address nutrient pollution is based on narrative standards for protection against adverse aesthetic conditions and harm to aquatic life. In 1999, Ohio EPA published a report that translated these narrative standards into target phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations to protect aquatic life. Regulatory activities taken by Ohio EPA, including Total Maximum Daily Loads and point source discharge limits, have used these target nutrient values for the past 14 years.
For the past 10 years, Ohio EPA has been working on developing new nutrient standards. This work was initiated in response to U.S. EPA's publication of national nutrient criteria recommendations in 2003 and Clean Water Act Section 106 grant work plan commitments. U.S. EPA has continued to encourage, and in some cases require, States to adopt numeric water quality criteria for nutrients.
In April 2013, Ohio EPA announced an Early Stakeholder Outreach public comment period regarding nutrient criteria in Ohio's water quality standard regulations. The Nutrient Technical Advisory Group (TAG) will advise the Agency as it moves forward with the next steps in the task of developing State surface water quality standards for nutrients.
Nutrient TAG agenda material and minutes are available on this web site. Attendance at TAG meetings is limited to members, alternates and invited observers. Contact Dan Dudley regarding participation as an observer.